DCIM Strategy Assessment
Answer 5 strategic questions to determine whether your DCIM platform is delivering monitoring — or real infrastructure governance.
This takes less than 2 minutes.
1 = Critical assets are broadly and consistently integrated
2 = Integration exists across multiple sites or areas, with partial gaps
3 = Most assets are integrated, but there are important gaps
4 = Only a limited portion of critical assets is integrated
4 = No structured criticality model exists
3 = Criticality is understood informally
2 = Criticality is mapped for some assets or areas
1 = A structured criticality model is in place
1 = Data is normalized and comparable across environments
2 = Data is partially structured, but inconsistencies remain
3 = Comparison is mostly manual or inconsistent
4 = Data is fragmented and difficult to compare
4 = No, technical events remain isolated
3 = Impact is interpreted manually after incidents
2 = Some event-to-impact correlation exists
1 = Event-to-impact correlation is structured and usable
1 = Executive indicators are structured and decision-ready
2 = Some governance indicators are available
3 = Executive reporting exists, but mostly manual
4 = It is used mainly for technical monitoring
Copyright © 2026
EMGRA Infrastructure Advisory
Multi-Site Infrastructure Governance | DCIM | Electrical Risk Visibility
This automated assessment provides an indicative evaluation based on user-provided responses.
It does not replace a detailed engineering analysis or on-site infrastructure audit.
This website is not affiliated with Facebook™ or Meta™, and is not endorsed by them in any way.Facebook™ is a registered trademark of Meta Platforms, Inc.